Paul,
I went and checked and "/bin/more" does not mork for me either but "/usr/bin/less" does.
I did not pick it up before because I have "alias more=less" in my .bashrc file.
Marnus
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Murray" pjmurray@tfb.com To: "Alain Knaff" alain@knaff.lu Cc: "Marnus van Niekerk" tmp@mjvn.net; zlibc@tux.org Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 7:59 PM Subject: Re: [zlibc] Redhat 8
Alain, I rebuild zlibc-09j with the new patch applied. Same results, "cat" works but "more" does not and I'm not sure why. I have to get "more" and another program called "marparse" to see use zlibc properly again. Below is the verbose output of a test file using more and the ldd for the more that I am using. The response of "no such file or directory is the same that I get with marparse"
Suggestions? Paul
[root@eeyore /tmp]# more test.txt progname = more /root/.zlibrc /usr/local/etc/zlibc.conf 0 0 default stating test.txt stated test.txt, rv=0 test.txt: No such file or directory [root@eeyore /tmp]# ldd /bin/more progname = sh /root/.zlibrc /usr/local/etc/zlibc.conf 0 0 default /lib/uncompress.o => /lib/uncompress.o (0x40013000) libtermcap.so.2 => /lib/libtermcap.so.2 (0x40039000) libc.so.6 => /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (0x42000000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x4003d000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alain Knaff" alain@knaff.lu To: "Paul Murray" pjmurray@tfb.com Cc: "Marnus van Niekerk" tmp@mjvn.net; zlibc@tux.org Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 9:59 AM Subject: Re: [zlibc] Redhat 8
On Tuesday 27 May 2003 18:41, Paul Murray wrote:
Marnus, can you let me know what you did? I don't see any difference in the
latest
patch ...and on my rh8 build,
I still only get "cat" to work with zlibc.
Help???
Paul
The previous patch accidentally contained a number of compilation files, which are cleaned up in the new one. Moreover, there was a problem in the getxattr functions which is now fixed (confusion between set and get), and another issue in the kernel_stat.h file. Most of these issues showed up as problems during compilation.
I just made another patch, because the 20030525 patch contained references to generated files in the reference copy.
If the problems still persist, could you please describe exactly what happens (patch command said "Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected", or "Compilation failed with the following message: ...", or running 'cat someFile' segfaults)
Regards,
Alain
_______________________________________________ zlibc mailing list zlibc@tux.org http://www.tux.org/mailman/listinfo/zlibc